I’m back.
Let’s start by eliminating the obvious, misguided, antiquated excuses.
No, it’s not about STEM. Though not where we need to be, over the past few decades, women have made significant strides in the fields of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). There have been substantial increases in the number of women earning degrees in these fields. While still underrepresented in certain disciplines like computer science and engineering, women now earn over half of the bachelor's degrees in biological and physical sciences. Prominent women have also increasingly held leadership roles in STEM, such as CEOs of tech companies, heads of research institutions, and policy leaders. Female scientists and engineers have been receiving greater recognition for their contributions, including prestigious awards like the Nobel Prize.
Some might argue that it has to do with traditional stereotypes assigned to initially male-assigned hobbies. If that were the case, then equestrian sports, fencing, and now soccer would be male-only or mostly. I know for a fact that dressage and jumping have become female dominated. Admittedly, transition is necessary. Why is the transition to female parity, or at least partial representation, has not occurred? Interestingly, in another thread, a comment is made about how ARRL, and likely the other national organizations worldwide, remain dominated by men who continue to steer their organization in a direction that reflects this stagnant image (https://hamcommunity.com/topic/2521-what-are-the-compliments-or-complaints-for-or-against-the-arrl/?do=findComment&comment=5684&_rid=1).
I would argue that we are at an inflection point that requires the achievement of critical mass. As you know, critical mass is a concept in sociology that refers to the smallest possible size or amount that an initiative, movement, or action needs to continue on its own or achieve a specific result. Essentially, once the "critical mass" is reached, a certain phenomenon becomes self-sustaining or self-perpetuating. The term is borrowed from physics, where it refers to the smallest amount of fissile material needed to maintain a nuclear chain reaction. In the social sciences, it's often used to describe the point at which social behavior or trends become widespread or mainstream. For instance, the adoption of a new technology could depend on reaching a critical mass of users for the technology to be successful and sustainable.
How do we achieve a critical mass of women in amateur radio? Here’s an idea… a woman at the helm of ARRL. Here’s another… SOTA… I’m serious. A study from the Outdoor Foundation reported that in the U.S., roughly half of outdoor participants were female. Why not let those hikers know that they can add a cool practice - amateur radio - to a practice they already love - hiking. How about cars, especially off-road vehicles? Though men were traditionally the buyers of off-road vehicles, by far, the trend has changed. The evidence remains anectodal but documented. Women are the driving force behind off-road vehicles (not urban-oriented SUVs but genuine off-road vehicles). Reach out to them and associate their activity with the benefits and fun of amateur radio.
In short, and in conclusion, more than anything we have an image problem, not an interest or capacity problem. Modern women are as technical and outdoors and geeky as men. But they see Amateur Radio for what it is, currently, an old white man’s sport. They don’t see the relation to their modern, technical, ambitious, busy lives. This image can be changed, if the powers that be choose to. BTW, I face this issue at home. My wife is capable, smart, accomplished… probably more so than me, and I kid not. My daughters are also the same, one being a very successful attorney with, wait for it, a passion for statistics! Ask any of the three why they are not attracted to ham radio, and the answer is universal… they see it as an activity for old men. Who can blame them? When I take them to a hamfest they play a game: “Let’s count the women or the younger than 50!”
Last point is about marketing. Manufacturers… target women! Target diversity! Create a space for women! Oh, right, and please do so without the usual, low-brow separative messaging. It’s not about women vs. men. It’s not about pink vs. blue. It’s about inclusiveness. Take a lesson from our military. The military succeeded in growing women’s numbers dramatically. We’ve gone from under 5% during the Vietnam era - mostly in traditional roles e.g. nursing, administration, etc. - to now approaching 20% including flying fighters and finally now becoming a Chief of Staff (Admiral Franchetti, Navy).
Let’s continue the discussion and, who knows, maybe we’ll shift the needle…
Also, if anyone has a nice photo that I can use to illustrate this article, please post it so that I can promote this article to the front page!